Онлайн тесты на тему "Иностранный язык в сфере юриспруденции | Итоговый и компетентностный тесты | 2 семестр | Синергия [ID 51486]"

Тестовое задание на тему: Иностранный язык в сфере юриспруденции. Итоговый и компетентностный тесты. 2 семестр
Тест набрал 94 баллов, был выполнен на зачет. Отчёт набранных баллов предоставляю в демо работах.
В купленном тесте будут вопросы и ответы которые размещены ниже.
Так же могу выполнять данную работу индивидуально. Делайте индивидуальный заказ.

Описание работы

Итоговый тест

According to legal theorist Salmond, law is defined as ...
… is an individual or entity tasked with formulating, modifying, and implementing laws on behalf of the government.
… is a legal framework originating in England that relies on judicial precedents rather than written statutes.
… is a comprehensive system of laws governing private rights and duties, primarily influenced by Roman law and codified regulations.
Connect the beginnings and endings of each phrase:
The concept of "stare decisis" is most closely associated the legal system of ...
Many people believe that … should be fair and equal for everyone involved.
Match the words with their definitions:
The primary source of law in a civil law system is ...
Many countries distinguish between … law and public law.
… law states citizens' rights and duties and regulates relationships between different branches of the state.
Put the following steps in the correct order for a civil lawsuit:
Put the stages of criminal proceedings in the correct order:
A primary function of solicitors is ...
Match each legal profession with the correct description:
Put the following legal professionals in order from highest to lowest position in the hierarchy:
The court that deals with minor criminal cases and some civil matters such as debts is the ...
Put the steps of the appeal process in the correct order:
Most civil claims in England are filed in the ...
The entity that typically starts criminal actions is ...
If the … is found guilty, the court can order punishment.
Match the words with their definitions:
Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of tort law?
The main difference between tort law and criminal law is that the ...
A successful tort claim may result in the award of … to compensate the victim for their losses.
The following is NOT a form of defamation ...
… covers attacks against someone's reputation through the written or spoken word.

Компетентностный тест

Read the text below and answer the question. There's only one correct answer.
Text: Maria is a law student studying different legal systems around the world. In her recent class, the professor asked the students to identify the two main traditions of law. Maria is confused and wants to ensure she understands the differences between Common Law and Continental Law.
Question: Which of the following statements correctly identifies the two main traditions of law in the world?
Read the text below and answer the question. There's only one correct answer.
Text: John is preparing for his final exam in his law course. He comes across a scenario where a country is involved in a dispute with another nation regarding trade regulations. He needs to determine which area of law primarily governs this situation.
Question: Which area of law is most relevant to the dispute between the two nations regarding trade regulations?
Read the dialogue and answer the question. There's only one correct answer.
Lila: Have you read the new law passed by Congress last week? It's about regulating environmental pollution.
Mark: No, I haven't. How is it different from the current regulations?
Lila: Well, it gives more power to federal agencies in enforcing and monitoring compliance with environmental laws. And it also imposes stricter penalties for violations.
Mark: That sounds like a good step towards protecting our environment. But what about local laws? Do they have any impact on this issue?
Lila: Yes, definitely. Each state has its own set of environmental laws that are tailored to their specific needs and challenges.
Mark: Right, I remember learning about that in my Environmental Law class. So even if there are national laws in place, local governments can create additional regulations?
Lila: Exactly. They can provide more detailed rules that cater to the particular needs of the community. And these local laws must comply with both state and federal laws.
Mark: Interesting. These different levels of laws can get quite complex.
Lila: Definitely. And it reflects the unique history, culture, values, and political institutions of each sovereign state. That's why we have diverse legal systems around the world.
Mark: Yeah, I never realized how vast and intricate the field of law is.
Lila: It sure is. And keeping up with all the changes and developments is no easy task.
Mark: You're right about that. Thanks for explaining everything to me, Lila. I really appreciate it.
Lila: Anytime, Mark. That's what friends are for!
Question: According to Lila, why do we have diverse legal systems around the world?
Read the text below and answer the question. There's only one correct answer.
Text: Emily is a law student in England who is interested in pursuing a career in the legal profession. She is trying to understand the differences between barristers, solicitors, and judges. Recently, she attended a seminar where different legal professionals spoke about their roles. After the seminar, Emily has a few questions regarding who does what in the legal system.
Question: Which of the following statements correctly describes the role of a barrister in England?
Read the text below and answer the question. There's only one correct answer.
Text: James is a university student studying law in England. He is particularly interested in understanding the differences between civil and criminal courts, as well as the structure of the legal system, including appeals and tribunals. After attending a guest lecture on the topic, he reflects on the advantages of having a case head in the Crown Court and how appeals work.
Question: Which of the following statements correctly describes an advantage of having a case head in the Crown Court?
Read the dialogue and answer the question. There's only one correct answer.
Carly: So you filed a claim against them after all?
Max: Yes, I had to. It was the only way to get what they owed me. And I couldn't just let it go and not do anything about it.
Carly: Right, but isn't going to court going to be expensive?
Max: It's worth it for what they did to me. Plus, there are legal aid services available if I need help with expenses.
Carly: That's true. But don't you have to prove your claims in order to win the case?
Max: Of course. They have to have merit and be based on solid evidence or proof. Luckily, I have everything organized and ready to present.
Carly: Good for you. Do you think their defense will hold up in court?
Max: Honestly, I'm not too worried about that. Their argument is pretty weak and easily disproven. My lawyer has already pointed out some holes in their defense.
Carly: You hired a lawyer? How much does that cost?
Max: Not nearly as much as I thought it would be. There are different options depending on your financial circumstances. Plus, my lawyer is confident we'll win this case.
Carly: Wow, okay. So how does the jury pick process work?
Max: Well, the judge oversees it and makes sure both sides agree on the jurors selected. The people chosen must listen to all the facts presented before deciding whether the defendant is guilty or not.
Carly: Interesting. What happens after the court proceedings?
Max: Once the trial concludes, the judge gives instructions to the jury and they deliberate the case. Then, when the verdict is announced by the foreperson, the official record of the trial is recorded by the court reporter.
Carly: Got it. So who else is involved besides the judge, lawyers, and jury?
Max: Well, there can also be interpreters for non-English speaking witnesses or defendants. And of course, the parties directly involved in the case - the plaintiff and defendant.
Carly: Hmm, okay. It seems like a complicated process, but hopefully justice will prevail in your case.
Max: Thank you, I'm really hoping so. I just hope the judge and jury see the truth and the wrong that has been done.
Question: Who oversees the jury selection process?
Read the text below and answer the question. There's only one correct answer.
Text: Emily is a professional photographer who rents a studio space in a busy downtown area. One day, while she is setting up for a photoshoot, a heavy sign from an adjacent building falls and injures her. The sign was not properly secured, and Emily learns that the building owner had received complaints about it being loose but had not taken any action to fix it. Emily decides to file a lawsuit against the building owner for her injuries.
Question: What legal principle is at play in Emily's case when she decides to sue the building owner for her injuries?
Read the dialogue and answer the question. There's only one correct answer.
Mike: Hey, Karen! What are you studying now?
Karen: Law. The law of tort to be specific.
Mike: Sounds boring.
Karen: Well, maybe it's not the most thrilling subject, but it's important in understanding legal responsibility for harm caused by one person to another.
Mike: Like, if someone slips and falls on your property and gets injured?
Karen: Yes, that would fall under negligence, a type of tort. It involves proving that someone failed to take reasonable care and caused harm as a result.
Mike: So if I spill coffee all over my neighbor's expensive couch, could they sue me for damages?
Karen: Absolutely. That would be an intentional tort, where someone deliberately causes harm or damage to another person or their property.
Mike: Wow. You really know your stuff.
Karen: Thanks. I find it interesting how complex and varied the laws of tort can be.
Mike: Do you think you'll specialize in this area after law school?
Karen: Maybe. But there are also other areas of law that interest me too, so I'm still keeping my options open.
Mike: Well, whatever you decide, I have no doubt you're going to make a great lawyer. Now let's go grab some lunch before my stomach commits an intentional tort against me.
Karen: Haha, sounds good. Let's go!
Question: How does Karen feel about specializing in tort law after law school?
Read the text below and answer the question. There's only one correct answer.
Text: James owns a small bakery in a residential neighborhood. One day, he decides to install an outdoor seating area for customers. To create the seating area, he places several tables and chairs on the sidewalk directly outside his shop. However, James does not leave enough space for pedestrians to pass comfortably. A neighbor, Sarah, complains that she has to walk into the street to get around the seating area, which is dangerous, especially with heavy traffic. After a few weeks, Sarah trips over one of the chairs that has been pushed out onto the sidewalk and injures her ankle. She decides to take legal action against James.
Question: What legal principle is primarily at play in Sarah's case when she decides to sue James for her injury?
Read the dialogue and answer the question. There's only one correct answer.
Kelly: Wow, that's a lot of information on tort law. Did you understand all of it?
Mark: Honestly, most of it went over my head. I'm still trying to wrap my head around the concept of negligence.
Kelly: I remember studying this in college. Negligence is when someone breaches their duty of care and causes harm to another person, right?
Mark: Yeah, that sounds about right. But there are also certain defenses available in cases of negligence. Like for psychiatric injury or economic loss.
Kelly: Wait, so can anyone sue for those things under the premise of negligence?
Mark: Not necessarily. The courts use a three-step test to determine if there is a duty of care owed by the defendant to the victim.
Kelly: Ah, I see. So basically, the first step is proving that the harm was reasonably foreseeable?
Mark: Exactly. And then the second step looks at the relationship between the two parties - whether it's one of proximity or not.
Kelly: And finally, the third step considers if it would be fair and just to hold the defendant liable for their actions.
Mark: Right. It seems like the case of Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman was a turning point in establishing this threefold test.
Kelly: Yeah, it definitely set a precedent. But I can imagine it must have been challenging determining liability in a complex situation like that.
Mark: Definitely. And with the ever-changing laws and legal systems, it's important to constantly stay informed and educated.
Question: What are some defenses available in cases of negligence?