Дипломная работа на тему "ТЮМГУ | Один вопрос, два ответа: анализ книг «Саммерхилл: радикальный подход к воспитанию детей» и «Педагогика угнетённых» в контексте культурных трансформаций 1960-х"
2
Работа на тему: Один вопрос, два ответа: анализ книг «Саммерхилл: радикальный подход к воспитанию детей» и «Педагогика угнетённых» в контексте культурных трансформаций 1960-х
Оценка: хорошо.
Оригинальность работы на момент публикации 50+% на антиплагиат.ру.
Ниже прилагаю все данные для покупки.
https://studentu24.ru/list/suppliers/Anastasiya1---1326
Оценка: хорошо.
Оригинальность работы на момент публикации 50+% на антиплагиат.ру.
Ниже прилагаю все данные для покупки.
https://studentu24.ru/list/suppliers/Anastasiya1---1326
Демо работы
Описание работы
МИНИСТЕРСТВО НАУКИ И ВЫСШЕГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИФедеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования
«ТЮМЕНСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ»
ШКОЛА ПЕРСПЕКТИВНЫХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ (SAS)
РЕКОМЕНДОВАНО К ЗАЩИТЕ В ГЭК
ВЫПУСКНАЯ КВАЛИФИКАЦИОННАЯ РАБОТА
бакалаврская работа
ONE QUESTION, TWO ANSWERS: ANALYSING SUMMERНILL: А RADICAL APPROACH ТО CНILD REARING AND PEDAGOGY OF ТНЕ OPPRESSED IN ТНЕ CONTEXT OF 1960S CULTURAL TRANSFORМA TIONS / ОДИН ВОПРОС, ДВА ОТВЕТА: AНAЛИ3 КНИГ «САММЕРХИЛЛ: РАДИКАЛЬНЫЙ ПОДХОД К ВОСПИТАНИЮ ДЕТЕЙ» И «ПЕДАГОГИКА УГНЕТЁННЫХ» В КОНТЕКСТЕ КУЛЬТУРНЫХ ТРАНСФОРМАЦИЙ 1960·Х
Код и наименование направления подготовки
50.03.01 Искусства и гуманитарные науки
Профиль «Культурные исследования»
Тюмень 2023
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY
By submitting this research project, I hereby certify that: I am its sole author and that any ideas, techniques, quotations, or any other material from the work of other people included in my research project, published or otherwise, are fully acknowledged in accordance with the standard referencing practices of my major; and that no third- party proofreading, editing, or translating services have been used in its completion.
Polina Avgustenyak
WORD COUNT: 12074
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT 5
INTRODUCTION 6
CHAPTER 1. SUMMERHILL STORY… 9
CHAPTER 2. PEDAGOGY OF THE OPPRESSED STORY… 17
CHAPTER 3. CULTURAL CONTEXTS 20
CHAPTER 4. PEDAGOGY OF THE OPPRESSED 34
CHAPTER 5. SUMMERHILL 37
CHAPTER 6. NEILL AND FREIRE 41
CONCLUSION 46
BIBLIOGRAPHY 49
ABSTRACT
This study aims to compare two educators, namely Alexander Sutherland Neill and Paulo Freire, in terms of their understandings of pedagogy. The parallel is drawn upon several factors, one of the major ones of which is their relation to the cultural transformations of the 1960s. This research questions how these transformations shaped the expression of alternative pedagogy in Neill’s Summerhill and Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed. The emphasis is also made on what the differences of these expressions can illustrate regarding the wider social and historical factors that influenced the development of alternative pedagogy during this time period. This study argues that the said differences reflect the unique cultural and historical contexts in which the two educational approaches were developed, and illustrate the international, social, and historical elements at play in the 1960s that affected the evolution of alternative pedagogy.
INTRODUCTION
The two books this research is structured around are those of Paulo Freire and Alexander Neill. The work of Alexander Sutherland Neill came to be widely known by educationalists in the English-speaking world in 1960 via the publication of Summerhill: A Radical Approach to Child Rearing in the United States. Freire’s book, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, reached the English-speaking part of the world only in 1970. It gained widespread recognition, and the reason for that was not only in its author’s groundbreaking educational theories and practices. The book's message of empowering the oppressed through education resonated strongly with the social and historical factors of the time, thus cementing Freire's place as one of the most significant figures in alternative education. Neill has made valuable contributions to popularisation of alternative education with his book as well, and it is just as well not solely due to his experience of establishing a school with the proclaimed innovative methodology, his views on parenting and child upbringing, or his philosophy about school education in general. The strong resonance that the book caused is also owed to the significant cultural changes that the 1960s are known for. And it is not shocking: this decade, among other notable events and movements, was a signature one for education in general and alternative education in particular.
Alternative pedagogy itself is not a fixed concept, but rather something that is constantly evolving and readjusting itself in response to social and historical contexts. Essentially, even the emergence of such a multifaceted phenomenon is difficult to attribute to a single time or place. For instance, according to Sally Tomlinson, being a key component of the alternative education movement as such [Tomlinson, 2019, p. 184], alternative pedagogy was born and started gaining traction in Britain during the epochal time of the 1960s, and “the idea of the school as a place of ‘freedom’ was central to [it].” [Tomlinson, 2019, p.143] Interestingly and quite contradictory, according to Timothy Wallace Young, “alternatives in public education have existed since the very birth of American education.” [Young, 1990, p. 13] His statement is
supported by Barry M. Franklin who argues that alternative pedagogy models were “aimed at transforming the values and institutions of American society,” [Franklin, 1994, p. 3] as well as “included a critique of the traditional, authoritarian, and bureaucratic structure of the public schools and sought to promote greater flexibility, creativity, and individuality in education.” [Franklin, 1994, p. 3] Place and initial goal of emergence of alternative pedagogy are not its only uncertain characteristics: the definition of the term is not universal or concrete either. It is an umbrella term and, speaking in words of Laudan Aron, “in its broadest sense covers all educational activities that fall outside the traditional K-121 school system.” [Aron, 2006, p.3] In her report for the US Department of Labor, Aron points toward another definition of alternative schooling, this time by mentioning the officially registered one, which yet once more states that alternative pedagogy is simply any kind of pedagogy that does not fit within the scope of traditional schooling: “the Common Core of Data, the U.S. Department of Education’s primary database on public elementary and secondary education, defines an alternative education school as ‘a public elementary/secondary school that addresses needs of students that typically cannot be met in a regular school, provides nontraditional education, serves as an adjunct to a regular school, or falls outside the categories of regular, special education or vocational education.’” [Aron, 2006, p. 3] “The needs that cannot be met in a regular school” part, I believe, is of particular importance here, since these needs might be, for example, for critical thinking skills or for the skills of active political position development, which the traditional school education usually does not aim at, while the alternative education usually promises.
The pedagogies put forward by Paulo Freire in his educational philosophy and those embodied by Alexander Neill at Summerhill School, which served as the inspiration for his book, respectively, may be the most well-known examples
1 K-12 stands for the classic education that includes “Kindergarten and 12 years of basic education (six years of primary education, four years of Junior High School, and two years of Senior High School).” [The K to 12 Basic Education Program, 2012]
Brazilian and British pedagogies that uphold these ideals and principles. At Summerhill, the emphasis is on self-directed learning, democratic decision-making, and the freedom of the child to choose their own activities and pursuits. These values and principles incarnated within Summerhill have not only been a part of but also influenced alternative education movements — Summerhill has served as a model for many other alternative schools, both in Europe and in the United States. In this way, the book and the school it represents have become a hallmark of alternative education and their publication and popularity were instrumental in spreading the ideas of alternative pedagogy beyond Britain. This was possible largely because of how Summerhill: A Radical Approach to Child Rearing was published. Yet to tell this story, I need to start from the beginning.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. About Paulo Freire [Electronic resource] // Pedagogy of the Oppressed. January 17, 2012.
2. About Pedagogy of the Oppressed [Electronic resource] // Pedagogy of the Oppressed. October 12, 2011.
3. Apple M. W., Gandin L. A., Hypolito A. M., Paulo Freire 1921-1997 / ed.: Palmer
J. A., Bresler L., Cooper D. E. // Fifty Modern Thinkers on Education: From Piaget to the Present, London: Routledge, 2001, P. 128–33.
4. Aron L. An Overview of Alternative Education / L. Aron // An Overview of Alternative Education, Washington: Urban Institute, 2006, P. 1–23.
5. Bedales History Timeline [Electronic resource] // Bedales School.
6. Bentley L. A Brief Biography of Paulo Freire [Electronic resource] // Pedagogy and Theatre of the Oppressed.
7. Blanden J., Machin S. Educational Inequality and the Expansion of UK Higher Education // Scottish Journal of Political Economy. 2004, Vol. 51, № 2. P. 230–49.
8. Bray M., Control of Education: Issues and Tensions in Centralization and Decentralization / ed.: Arnove R. F., Torres C. A., Franz S. // Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global and the Local, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1999. P. 201–22.
9. Briefing Paper: Secondary Modern Schools [Electronic resource] / SESC: Secondary Education and Social Change in the United Kingdom since 1945 // SESC, October 2017.
10. British Youth Culture: 1960, Examples & Timeline | StudySmarter [Electronic resource] // StudySmarter US.
11. Carter L. ‘Experimental’ Secondary Modern Education in Britain, 1948–1958 // Cultural and Social History. 2016, Vol. 13, № 1. P. 23–41.
12. Charkin E. ‘A Summerhill in Scotland’? Experiences of Freedom and Community at Kilquhanity School (1940–1996) // Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2022, Vol. 56, № 6. P. 985–97.
13. Civil Rights Movement [Electronic resource] // John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum. 2000.
14. Collins D. E., Paulo Freire, His Life, Works, and Thought / D. E. Collins // Paulo Freire, His Life, Works, and Thought, New York: Paulist Press, 1977, P. 1–150.
15. Cote M., Day R. J. F., De Peuter G., Utopian Pedagogy: Radical Experiments against Neoliberal Globalization / M. Cote, R. J. F. Day, G. De Peuter // Utopian Pedagogy: Radical Experiments against Neoliberal Globalization, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006, P. 1–107.
16. Croall J., Neill of Summerhill (Routledge Revivals): Permanent Rebel. 1983 / J. Croall // Neill of Summerhill (Routledge Revivals): Permanent Rebel. 1983, Reprint, London: Routledge, 2013, P. 113–55.
17. Daun H. Privatisation, Decentralisation and Governance in Education in the Czech Republic, England, France, Germany and Sweden // International Review of Education. 2004, Vol. 50, № ?. P. 325–46.
18. De Vries M. S. The Rise and Fall of Decentralization: A Comparative Analysis of Arguments and Practices in European Countries. // European Journal of Political Research. 2000, Vol. 38, № 2. P. 193–224.
19. Edwards D. B. Jr., DeMatthews D. E. Historical Trends in Educational Decentralization in the United States and Developing Countries: A Periodization and Comparison in the Post-WWII Context // Education Policy Analysis Archives. 2014, Vol. 22, № 40. P. 1–39.
20. Eisenmann L. A Time of Quiet Activism: Research, Practice, and Policy in American Women’s Higher Education, 1945–1965 // History of Education Quarterly. 2005, Vol. 45, № 1. P. 1–17.
21. Elementary and Secondary Education Act · the Legislation [Electronic resource] / The Association of Centers for the Study of Congress // The Great Society Congress.
22. Franklin B. M., History of Alternative Education / B. M. Franklin // The Handbook of Alternative Education, New York: Macmillan Reference Library, 1994, P. 1–13.
23. Freire P., Pedagogy of the Oppressed / trans.: M. B. Ramos // Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: The Seabury Press, 1970, P. 9–183.
24. Fromm E., Foreword to ‘Summerhill: A Radical Approach to Child Rearing’ / A. S. Neill // Summerhill: A Radical Approach to Child Rearing, New York: Hart Publishing Company, 1960, Edition 1, P. ix-xvi.
25. Gadotti M., Reading Paulo Freire: His Life and Work / M. Gadotti // Reading Paulo Freire: His Life and Work, New York: New York State University Press, 1994, P.
5–10.
26. Gadotti M., Torres C. A. Paulo Freire: Education for Development // Development and Change. 2009, Vol. 40, № 6. P. 1255–67.
27. Gibson K., et. al. Life after Centrepoint: Accounts of Adult Adjustment after Childhood Spent at an Experimental Community // New Zealand Journal of Psychology. 2011, Vol. 40, № 3. P. 41–51.
28. Gittell M. Decentralization and Citizen Participation in Education / Review // Public Administration Review, 32, October 1972.
29. Goodman J. Social Change and Secondary Schooling for Girls in the ‘Long 1920s’: European Engagements // History of Education. 2007, Vol. 36, № 4-5. P. 497–513.
30. Goodman P., Compulsory Mis-Education and the Community of Scholars / P. Goodman // Compulsory Mis-Education and the Community of Scholars, New York: Horizon Press, 1964, Edition 1, P. 1–16.
31. Gordon R. Review of ‘Juke Box Britain: Americanisation and Youth Culture 1945- 60’ by Adrian Horn [Electronic resource] // University of Glasgow. 2009.
32. Gould J. L., Solidarity under Siege: The Latin American Left, 1968 / J. L. Gould // AHR Forum, 2009, P. 348–75.
33. Green S.J.D. The 1944 Education Act: A Church-State Perspective // Parliamentary History. 2008, Vol. 19, № 1. P. 148–64.
34. Gurner R., Day Schools of England / R. Gurner // Day Schools of England, London: JM Dent & Sons, 1930, P. 1–23.
35. Hall S. The Emergence of Cultural Studies and the Crisis of the Humanities // October. 1990, Vol. 53. P. 11–14.
36. History [Electronic resource] // Summerhill School.
37. Hobson P., A.S. Neill. 1883-1973 / ed.: Bresler L., Cooper D., Palmer J. // Fifty Modern Thinkers on Education: From Piaget to the Present, London: Routledge, 2001, P. 1–6.
38. Jeffreys K. Labour and the Wartime Coalition. From the Diaries of James Chuter Ede, 1941-1945 / ed.: Jeffreys K. London: Historians’ Press, 1987, P. 184–224.
39. Jones D. New Sherwood Remembered [Electronic resource] // Sisyphus (blog). August 7, 2019.
40. Jones L. Y. Swinging 60s? // Smithsonian Magazine. 2006, P. 102–7. 41.Kincheloe J. L., Steinberg S. R., Changing Multiculturalism: New Times, New
Curriculum / J. L. Kincheloe, S. R. Steinberg // Changing Multiculturalism: New Times, New Curriculum, Buckingham: Open University Press, 2002, P. 23–26, 168–175.
42. Kirylo J. D., Boyd D., Paulo Freire: His Faith, Spirituality, and Theology / J. D. Kirylo, D. Boyd // Paulo Freire: His Faith, Spirituality, and Theology, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2017, P. 1–11, 27–39.
43. Kishlansky M. A., Josephson P. R. United Kingdom - Britain since 1945 [Electronic resource] // Encyclop?dia Britannica. June 2, 2019.
44. Lange C. M., Sletten S. J. Alternative Education: A Brief History and Research Synthesis [Electronic resource] // National Association of State Directors of Special Education. 2002.
45. Lobatto R. Welcome to the King Alfred School | London [Electronic resource] // King Alfred School.
46. Lopez M. Review of ‘Education and the Cold War: The Battle for the American School.’ // The Councilor: A Journal of the Social Studies. 2018, Vol. 70, № 2. P. 1–4.
47. Lucas H. Neill and Summerhill // The Magazine of Alternative Education. 2005, № 40. P. 21–27.
48. Lury C., Consumer Culture / C. Lury // Consumer Culture, New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1996, Edition 2, P. 1–36.
49. Macro K. J. What Is Alternative Education? // The Journal of Educational Alternatives. 2004, P. 1–18.
50. Marwick A. The Cultural Revolution of the Long Sixties: Voices of Reaction, Protest, and Permeation // The International History Review. 2005, Vol. 27, № 4. P. 780–806.
51. McCulloch G. History of Education in Britain since 1960 // Histoire de L’education. 2020, № 154. P. 119–41.
52. McCulloch G. Review of ‘Parity and Prestige in English Secondary Education Revisited’ by Olive Banks // British Journal of Sociology of Education. 2008, Vol.
29, № 4. P. 1–17.
53. McCulloch G. The History of Secondary Education // History of Education. 2012, Vol. 41, № 1. P. 25–39.
54. Moura Castro C. The Impact of European and American Influences on Brazilian Higher Education // European Journal of Education. 1983, Vol. 18, № 4. P. 368–74.
55. Myers M. Student Protests Past and Present and the Legacy of 2010 [Electronic resource] // Pluto Press. October 21, 2017.
56. Mysakova K., The Youth Culture Phenomenon: Transformation of the British Society in the 1960s and Its Impact on Popular Culture / Bachelor Thesis // 2018.
57. Neill A. S., Summerhill: A Radical Approach to Child Rearing / A. S. Neill // Summerhill: A Radical Approach to Child Rearing, New York: Hart Publishing Company, 1960, P. 12–230.
58. Neill A. S. To Harold H. Hart / A. S. Neill // Letter to Harold Hart. October 30, 1959.
59. Osgood R. L., 1960-1968: Challenging Traditions in Special Education / R. L. Osgood // The History of Inclusion in the United States, Gallaudet University Press, 2009, P. 69–91.
60. Parker C. M., Abortion, Homosexuality and the Slippery Slope: Legislating ‘Moral’ Behaviour in South Australia [Electronic resource] / PhD dissertation // University of Adelaide, 2013.
61. Plank D. N. The Expansion of Education: A Brazilian Case Study // Comparative Education Review. 1987, Vol. 31, № 3. P. 361–76.
62. Radhouane M., Akkari A. Intercultural Education in Brazil [Electronic resource] // Springer EBooks. January 1, 2022. P. 95–104.
63. Robinson J. The Need for Diverse Perspectives in Higher Education [Electronic resource] // The Miami Patriot. May 13, 2022.
64. Santos Filho J. C. The Recent Process of Decentralization and Democratic Management of Education in Brazil // International Review of Education. 1993, Vol. 39, № 5. P. 391–403.
65. Shah R. K. Historical Foundation of Learner Centred Teaching // Ijariie. 2020, Vol. 6, № 6. P. 383–98.
66. Stevens S. The External Struggle against Apartheid: New Perspectives // Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development.
2016, Vol. 7, № 2. P. 295–314.
67. Storrs L. R. Y. McCarthyism and the Second Red Scare [Electronic resource] // Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History. July 2, 2015.
68. The 1960s Education: Overview [Electronic resource] // Encyclopedia.com. 2019.
69. The Bedales Difference [Electronic resource] // Bedales School.
70. The K to 12 Basic Education Program [Electronic resource] // Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. 2012.
71. Thomas N. Protests against the Vietnam War in 1960s Britain: The Relationship between Protesters and the Press // Contemporary British History. 2008, Vol. 22, № 3. P. 335–54.
72. Tomlinson S., Education and Race from Empire to Brexit / S. Tomlinson // Education and Race from Empire to Brexit, Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2019, Edition 1, P. 141–200.
73. Legal Highlight: The Civil Rights Act of 1964 [Electronic resource] / U.S. Department of Labor
74. Lyndon Johnson and the Great Society [Electronic resource] / US History II. // courses.lumenlearning.com.
75. Van Bavel J., Reher D. S. The Baby Boom and Its Causes: What We Know and What We Need to Know // Population and Development Review. 2013, Vol. 39, № 2. P. 264–65.
76. Weitz M. What Is Aesthetic Education? // Educational Theatre Journal. 1972, Vol. 24, № 1. P. 1–4.
77. Wincott D. Images of Welfare in Law and Society: The British Welfare State in Comparative Perspective // Journal of Law and Society. 2011, Vol. 38, № 3. P. 343– 75.
78. Young T. W., Public Alternative Education: Options and Choice for Today’s Schools / T. W. Young // Public Alternative Education: Options and Choice for Today’s Schools, NewYork: Teachers College Press, 1990, P. 4–28.
79. Zellinger M., Die Internationale Schule Hellerau 1921 – 1923 // Graduate Thesis, 1996.
Похожие работы
Другие работы автора
НЕ НАШЛИ, ЧТО ИСКАЛИ? МОЖЕМ ПОМОЧЬ.
СТАТЬ ЗАКАЗЧИКОМ